| |
|
| CAP 2010 |
Today: Tuesday, 07 September 2010 |
| The
Consolidated Appeal Process is a planning mechanism by which the humanitarian
country team agrees on joint priorities and a common strategic approach to the
provision of humanitarian aid. As a coordination mechanism the CAP has fostered
closer cooperation between governments, donors, aid agencies, and a range of
other humanitarian organisations." We should also add a longer intro of the key
priorities for the CAP 2010, and the funding requirements. |
 |
Published: 2009-12-09 |
|
| |
Overview of the 2010 Consolidated Appeal for the occupied
The 2010 Consolidated Appeal (CAP) in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) requests a total ofUSD664,473,688 for 236 humanitarian and early recovery projects: 147 to be implemented by United Nations agencies, and 89 by international and local NGOs. The residents of the Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem and Area C of the West Bank, including those living in areas near Israeli settlements and in Barrier-adjacent areas,have been identified as priority populations in need of humanitarian assistance and protection. Programs regarding Cash Assistance/Cash for Work, and Food, Security and Nutrition comprise approximately two thirds of this year?s funding requirements.
Arabic
|
English
|
Hebrew
|
| |
| |
 |
Published: 2010-01-27 |
|
| |
Consolidated Appeals Process | 2010
The consolidated Appeal Process for 2010 and presentation.
English
|
| |
| |
 |
Published: 2010-07-11 |
|
| |
CAP 2010 Mid-Year Review
At mid-year, the oPt 2010 CAP is 42% funded. The humanitarian community in the oPt originally
appealed for US$664.4 million1 for 236 projects. As of 25 June 2010, $254 million had been received,
including carry-over funds from 2009. Uneven and/or low funding in some clusters/sectors threatens
the implementation of key projects and greatly impairs partners’ ability to meet stated objectives.
During the Mid-Year Review, requirements have been revised down to $603 million through the
merging of some projects, the removal of others due to lack of funds, and the downward revision of
requirements to reflect the remaining implementation period.
English
|
| |
| |
|
|
|